| |
Th, Feb 24, 2005
|
|
|
|
Continuing with
Scardamalia and Bereiter:- the three time-honoured answers to effective
knowledge building are laid out below. It seems clear that use of
blogs in classrooms can help further the aims they set out. What do you
think? Let us know. by hitting the discuss or feedback buttons.
The challenge, then, will be to get students on to that
trajectory. But what is the nature of this trajectory and of movement along it?
There are three time-honored answers that provide partial solutions at best. One approach emphasizes foundational knowledge: First
master what is already known. In practice this means that knowledge creation
does not enter the picture until graduate school or adult work, by which time
the vast majority of people are unprepared for the challenge.
A second approach focuses on subskills: Master component
skills such as critical thinking, scientific method, and collaboration; later,
assemble these into competent original research, design, and so forth. Again,
the assembly—if it occurs at all—typically occurs only at advanced levels that
are reached by only a few. Additionally, the core motivation—advancing the
frontiers of knowledge—is missing, with the result that the component skills
are pursued as ends in themselves, lacking in authentic purpose. Subskill
approaches remain popular (now often under the banner of “twenty-first century
skills”) because they lend themselves to parsing the curriculum into specific
objectives.
A third approach is associated with such labels as
“learning communities,” “project-based learning,” and “guided discovery.”
Knowledge is socially constructed, and best supported through collaborations
designed so that participants share knowledge and tackle projects that
incorporate features of adult teamwork, real-world content, and use of varied
information sources. This is the most widely supported approach at present,
especially with regard to the use of information technology. The main drawback
is that it too easily declines toward what is discussed below as shallow
constructivism.
Posted by Robin Brooke-Smith on 24/2/05; 11:44:38 AM
from the Education dept.
|
|
This Page was last update:
Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:44:38 AM
This page was originally posted: 24/02/2005; 11:44:38.
Copyright 2008 Creative Consulting Group
|
|